Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neeraj Krishnan's avatar

Some scattered thoughts:

1. It takes at least high school education (maybe more?) to engage with Professor Caplan's arguments, check the studies on sheepskin effect, signalling, learning and forgetting, etc. In Professor Caplan's world there would be far fewer with the ability to read his book :)

2. The thing with "vocational training" is it's never something the well educated wish for their own kids. Just for the unwashed masses. Also it's a one way street. You get a kid to drop out of school at 13 or 14 to learn a trade as an apprentice, you are making a committal decision early in life and hard to reverse. That kid is unlikely to learn if she has a natural talent for surgery, say, and that route is closed off. A person with a medical degree can always pick a different vocation later in life.

Expand full comment
Gerard@pro-ict-beheer.nl's avatar

Studying physics, chemistry accounting economics without math is impossible it s the vey core it maybe boring but also trains students to think abstractly and keep a thought proces going until the aha erlebnis

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts