5 Comments
User's avatar
Евгений Львов's avatar

Спасибо вам за работу, здоровья вам и хорошего настроения.

Expand full comment
yakuhito's avatar

Thank you for the credit! I like the idea of list nodes having the logic baked in as opposed to a 'central' singleton controlling nodes - that way, you can have many registrations "in parallel" unless they happen to share a common neighbor (which gets less likely the longer the list is). There's no need for a singleton to create/spend nodes here, and this looks like a better design (in tems of cost and moving parts) than one that includes a singleton.

I'm curious, why did you go with a pre-launcher instead of a modified launcher puzzle?

Expand full comment
Bram Cohen's avatar

Mostly so it can be a 'normal' singleton but now that you mention it the regular singleton logic views the launcher id as opaque anyway so maybe the extra pre-launcher step is unnecessary.

Expand full comment
Ismaheem's avatar

What is the point in preparing for higher fees? Transaction fees have been free since launch and the blockchain is rapidly decreasing in popularity. Preparing for higher fees when everything is declining is so misguided

Expand full comment
Tatarin ;-)'s avatar

🖖🤔Thank you for the detailed post. This is a logical and necessary solution for future network scalability. By solving the barrier of high on chain fees for new farmers in advance, you are addressing a critical growth constraint. The proposed method is technically elegant.🔮🌱

Expand full comment